Talk:Green Eggs and Ham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconVital articles: Level 5 / Arts Start‑class
WikiProject iconGreen Eggs and Ham has been listed as a level-5 vital article in Arts. If you can improve it, please do.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconNovels C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
 Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconChildren's literature C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
 High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Things you can do

Constrained writing[edit]

"The vocabulary of the text consists of just 50 different words and was the result of a bet between Seuss and Bennett Cerf, Dr. Seuss's publisher" -- thus this book seems to be an example of constrained writing, a genuine piece of experimental literature, of which there was a lot being produced in the world around 1960. I'd suggest somehow working in a link to the Wikipedia article on that subject: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constrained_writing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.18.208.63 (talk) 03:20, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feel free to Be Bold and make it so. Ckruschke (talk) 14:40, 28 June 2017 (UTC)CkruschkeReply[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Green Eggs and Ham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:21, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ISBN?[edit]

The given ISBN (978-0-394-80016-5) is misleading, in the sense that the original publication date, as noted in the line above, is 1960, i.e., 10 years before ISBNs existed! What is Wikipedia's policy in such cases? WP:ISBNs doesn't seem to help. Ghastlyman (talk) 16:49, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unnamed[edit]

I know the man that Sam-I-Am pesters is later named "Guy-Am-I" in the Netflix series, but why he still is unnamed in the book other than vague descriptions like "Grouchy Guy" or "Sam's Friend"? Allan Bao (talk) 18:03, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Because he is unnamed in the book. Decisions made by the people behind the Netflix series have no bearing on the original book. Ckruschke (talk) 14:52, 22 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That's why you left the note to clarify that it is pertinent to the original book where the 2nd character is originally unnamed, besides naming him Grouchy Guy or Sam's Friend.Allan Bao (talk) 13:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]